What I learned from “Principles for Navigating Big Debt Crisis” by Ray Dalio

As regular subscribers will know, I recently recommended reading Ray Dalio’s book, “Principles For Navigating Big Debt Crisis“. Dalio outlines Bridgewater’s research on more than 50 debt crisis that have occurred over the past 100 years, drawing together the remarkable similarities. It provides a consistent playbook for how crisis play out, how policymakers respond (who often make the same mistakes) and what it means for investors. This article pulls together some of the main insights I took away from the book (emboldened text mine).

Dalio notes that debt crisis typically occur “because debt and debt service costs rise faster than the incomes that are needed to service them, causing a deleveraging.”

Important to note that debt cycles are not limited to the business cycle. Debt can gradually build up so that, “each short-term cyclical high and each short-term cyclical low is higher in its debt-to-income ratio than the one before it.” According to Dalio this is just human nature. People have a natural inclination to borrow and spend more instead of paying debt back. “As a result, over long periods of time, debts rise faster than incomes. This creates the long-term debt cycle.”

Debt cycles are nothing new.

“It has existed for as long as there has been credit, going back to before Roman times. Even the Old Testament described the need to wipe out debt once very 50 years, which was called the Year of Jubilee.”

Central banks help inflate the bubble rather than constrain it by focusing on inflation and growth, not debt.

“In my opinion it’s very important for central banks to target debt growth with an eye towards keeping it at a sustainable level-i.e., at a level where the growth in income is likely to be large enough to service the debts regardless of what credit is used to buy.”

Forecasting a recession has become a regular thing in the financial media. Most predictions of a recession on a horizon rest on standard metrics: yield curve inversions, the length of the business cycle and other forward looking indicators of business activity. However, this misses the point that recent recessions have been caused by crisis rather than an overheating economy.

The long-term debt cycle creates an economy that gradually becomes more and more vulnerable to collapse through every subsequent business cycle. The lesson from the financial crisis is that debt, especially corporate debt has continued to grow. Spotting the signs that a debt crisis is about to boil over will become increasingly important.

How to identify a debt crisis before it occurs? According to Dalio the most defining characteristics of bubbles that can be measured are:

  1. Prices are high relative to traditional measures.
  2. Prices are discounting future rapid price appreciation from these high levels.
  3. There is broad bullish sentiment.
  4. Purchases are being financed by high leverage.
  5. Buyers have made exceptionally extended forward purchases to speculate or to protect against future price gains.
  6. New buyers have entered the market.
  7. Stimulative monetary policy threatens to inflate the bubble even more.

As with a lot of economic indicators it pays to look at the distribution, not just the average. According to Dalio in order to “anticipate a debt crisis well, one has to look at the specific debt service abilities of the individual entities, which are lost in these averages. More specifically, a high level of debt or debt service to income is less problematic if the average is well distributed across the economy than if it is concentrated-especially if it is concentrated in key entities.”

So what happens at the top of the cycle?

“The fastest rate of tightening typically comes about five months prior to the top of the stock market. The economy is then operating at a high rate, with demand pressing up against the capacity to produce. Unemployment is normally at cyclical lows and inflation is rising.”

The more leverage that exists in the economy and the higher the prices, the less tightening it takes to prick the debt bubble and the bigger the bust that follows. According to Dalio investors overestimate the power of monetary policy to respond once the bubble starts to burst:

“In the immediate postbubble period, the wealth effect of asset price movements has a bigger impact on economic growth than monetary policy…people mistakenly judge the decline to be a buying opportunity and find stocks cheap in relation to past earnings and expected earnings, failing to account for the decline in earnings that is likely to result from what’s to come.”

Things start to get really ugly when people begin to worry about cash flow. Lack of cash flow is an immediate and severe problem-and as a result, the trigger and main issue in most debt crisis according to the author. Dalio makes the case that even well capitilised business may suffer cash flow problems if the equity is in illiquid assets:

“With investors unwilling to continue lending and borrowers scrambling to find cash to cover their debt payments, liquidity-i.e., the ability to sell investments for money-becomes a major concern.”

A major part of the deleveraging process is people discovering that what they thought of as their wealth was merely people’s promises to give them money. As Dalio explains, “most of what people think is money is really credit, and credit does appear out of thin air during good times and then disappear at bad times.” As the deleveraging takes hold, those promises are no longer kept and that perception of their wealth also vanishes.

Authorities rarely learn the lessons of past debt crisis, but investors place too much faith in them to make things right again. A repeated pattern through all debt crisis is that actions to stimulate the economy have far less impact than investors believe (or hope) they will at the time.

“During the Great Depression there were six big rallies in the stock market (of between 16 percent and 48 percent) in a bear market that declined a total of 89 percent. All of these rallies were triggered by government actions that were intended to reduce the fundamental imbalance.

In order to counteract the deflationary forces of the debt cycle aggressive stimulation is required. Based on the debt crisis Dalio has studied there is a pattern to how authorities respond with action normally coming, “two to three years into the depression, after stocks have fallen more than 50 percent, economic activity has fallen about 10 percent, and unemployment has risen to around 10 to 15 percent.”

A beautiful deleveraging?

“People ask if printing money will raise inflation. It won’t if it offsets falling credit and the deflationary forces are balanced with this reflationary force…Remember, spending is what matters. A dollar of spending paid for with money has the same effect on prices as a dollar of spending paid for with credit. By “printing money”, the central bank can make up for the disappearance of credit with an increase in the amount of money.”

After cutting interest rates and undertaking quantitative easing central banks are left “pushing on a string”. It’s here Dalio notes that the previous deflationary debt crisis have resulted in a, “coordination of monetary and fiscal policy in a way that creates incentives for people to spend on goods and services.” Arguably, this is where the US, Europe and Japan find themselves now.

Debt crisis are usually deflationary, except in economies heavily reliant on foreign debt and investment:

Getting this balance right is much more difficult in countries that have a large percentage of debt denominated in foreign currency and owned by foreign investors because the debt can’t be monetised or restructured so easily. This is why debt crisis in emerging economies tend to spill over into high inflation, hitting neighbouring countries and forcing authorities to adopt much more extreme measures to get their economies under control.

These inflationary depressions are far more likely to occur in countries that:

  1. Don’t have a reserve currency.
  2. Have low foreign exchange reserves and so the cushion to protect against capital outflows is small.
  3. Have a large foreign debt.
  4. Have a large and increasing budget and/or current account deficit.
  5. Have negative real interest rates which means that lenders are not adequately compensated for holding the currency.
  6. Have a history of high inflation and negative total returns resulting in low trust in the governments control over the economy.

Some countries are more susceptible to debt fueled binges and busts than others.

“Economies whose growth is significantly supported by debt-financed building of fixed investments, real estate, and infrastructure are particularly susceptible to large cyclical swings because the fast rates of building those long lived assets are not sustainable.”

It’s no wonder that the countries that have suffered the most spectacular inflationary debt crisis have been those where lots of debt fueled infrastructure spending has taken place.

“This type of cycle-where a strong growth upswing driven by debt-financed real estate, fixed investment, and infrastructure spending is followed by a downswing driven by a debt-challenged slowdown in demand-is very typical of emerging economies because they have so much building to do.”

Investors can be so invested in an emerging economies growth story that even a minor event (a sharp reversal in commodity prices) can trigger a slowdown in capital inflow growth and even a net reversal.

Materials Risk is a verified creator on the Brave Rewards platform. If you'd like to support Materials Risk please consider tipping some BAT. You can download the Brave web browser here.

End destination

Winding Road, Road, Travel, Curved Road, Curvy Road

It’s almost school holiday’s here in the UK. It that time of the year when families typically drive to the airport, to their next Airbnb, to the campsite. Anything to get away from the typical British summertime (this year has been especially dreary). Almost always it involves spending more time than you have done all year with your family, in a confined space for hours, being distracted by “How much further?”, complaints about your driving all the while having to focus on the road ahead of you for several hours I’m lucky(!) enough to be counting myself among that group over the next few weeks.

In preparing for my journey I happened across an article about being a better driver during the holidays. Two suggestions in particular struck me as important lessons; to always look further ahead, and to always think about your own journey as personal to you.

Being able to anticipate the speed of other cars further down the road, the actions of pedestrians and the conditions of the road should help you be a better driver. In essence its about being able to give yourself enough time to react to events. The more you practice, the greater your experience, the more likely (at least in theory) that you will avoid any trouble.

Meanwhile, always thinking about your own journey as personal to you means that you don’t react negatively to the behaviour of others on the road, while also becoming more proactive and compassionate in how you interact with other road users.

What does this all have to do with investing and trading commodity markets? First its about looking ahead, looking for the signs that things may be about to turn, that sentiment is too extreme and that investors may be about to run for the exits. In commodity markets this can take the form of extreme market positioning in futures markets, commodity producer sentiment (supply discipline for example) and seasonal demand and supply trends.

Second, whatever your outlook, whatever your trading or investing style its important to always consider that your own journey. That goes for your own level of risk, the instruments you trade, what time period you are considering, what your hopes and dreams are. Its your commodity market play book, no one else’s.

It’s always been challenging balancing your own objectives versus the fear of missing out, comparing yourself to others and then overly reacting. It’s now much harder to sift through what is important to your journey, and what is not. Someone’s tweet about their view on gold may run counter to your own, but they may have a completely different time frame to yours. Their concerns may just represent a mere footnote in years to come on your investment journey.

The danger (to return to the driving analogy) is that you get caught up in someones else’s race, someone who has a completely different destination to you, an alternative set of time constraints with completely contrasting priorities to you. We’re all on the same road, but we’re all on very different journeys. As it is with our highways and byways, as it is in the markets, keep a watchful eye on others but never let them dictate how you should respond to events. As with driving, as it is with investing always have your end destination in mind.

Materials Risk is a verified creator on the Brave Rewards platform. If you'd like to support Materials Risk please consider tipping some BAT. You can download the Brave web browser here.

African Swine Fever unlikely to be an aporkalyptic event for hog futures

Pigs, Animal, Farm, Agriculture, Livestock, Meat

According to the Chinese Zodiac, 2019 is the Year of the Pig. This year has certainly lived up to its name. The discovery and subsequent outbreaks of the African Swine Fever (ASF) virus in China in August 2018 sent shockwaves through the hog market. ASF is a highly contagious virus that ravages hog herds and currently has no cure.

The price of US hog futures surged by 67% during March-April as the scale of the potential losses became clearer. Since then though prices have retraced 50% of the earlier spike higher, falling back to around 70 cents per lb.

In the past week estimates provided to Reuters have suggested that as many as half of China’s breeding pigs have either died from the disease or have been slaughtered because of the spreading disease, much higher than previously thought. Despite this the markets reaction has been muted.

The problem for hog futures is that the US market is fundamentally oversupplied. The US hog herd is at its highest level since 1943. American producers had been building up their herds in anticipation of increased demand from China. The US-China trade war has muted that response, but there are signs that things could improve.

Meanwhile, China’s pork prices had been kept under control through a combination of releasing stock from its frozen pork reserve (much like the US has Strategic Petroleum Reserve, China has one for pork), and secondly farmers sending pigs to be culled early, especially if the disease was discovered on a local farm. As frozen stocks run low and with no more room for more supply then prices have started to rise. China’s agricultural ministry has said prices could surge by 70% in coming months as a result of the outbreak.

China’s imports of pork and swine offal from the US in May jumped to the highest in at least a year, exceeding the level before Beijing’s hefty 62% retaliatory tariffs were imposed in July last year. China’s total meat imports also hit a record in May as looming meat shortages drove up domestic prices. Nevertheless, tariffs are likely to mean that other hog producing regions like Europe and Brazil are likely to benefit most from Chinese import demand.

Instead, the US hog market may also see strong export support from other countries affected by ASF. Outbreaks of the disease have been detected in parts of Southeast Asia, Japan, Poland and Russia. According to Capital Economics pork represents around 2% of the consumer price index basket in many of these countries (vs 3.5% in China and 1% in most other emerging economies).

The longer term hog chart offers some useful insights as to the upside potential. Overall, it suggests that unless ASF (or another disease) spreads to the US, Europe or Brazil then it is very unlikely that prices will go much above current levels, at least not for any sustained period. Apart from a few very brief periods over the past two decades the price of hog futures has typically bounced between 50 and 90 cents per lb. Seasonal demand and supply fluctuations typically resulting in higher prices in the spring/summer and lower prices in the autumn. The only time hog futures have been outside of this range for a significant period was in 2014 when disease struck. Back then the PED virus decimated the pig herd causing prices to hit a record high just over 130 cents per lb in July 2014.

Another factor likely to limit any future upside price response is the substitution effect. Recent statistics from Shandong, China’s largest feed producing province show that farmers have indeed cut back on hog production, but the drop in output has been offset by an increase in poultry output. China’s poultry consumption has increased in recent years, as demographic changes, growing wealth and urbanisation contributing towards the trend. Indeed, the outbreak of ASF may accelerate these longer term trends. According to a recent report from Mizuho the nation’s consumers “aren’t discriminating between a disease that only affects the hog and what can be transmitted to humans,” turning them off from wanting to eat pork and reducing consumption.

Related article: Livestock prices: The top 10 most important drivers

Materials Risk is a verified creator on the Brave Rewards platform. If you'd like to support Materials Risk please consider tipping some BAT. You can download the Brave web browser here.